Logic gate
A logic gate is a device that performs a Boolean function, a logical operation performed on one or more binary inputs that produces a single binary output. Depending on the context, the term may refer to an ideal logic gate, one that has, for instance, zero rise time and unlimited fanout, or it may refer to a nonideal physical device^{[1]} (see ideal and real opamps for comparison).
The primary way of building logic gates uses diodes or transistors acting as electronic switches. Today, most logic gates are made from MOSFETs (metal–oxide–semiconductor fieldeffect transistors).^{[2]} They can also be constructed using vacuum tubes, electromagnetic relays with relay logic, fluidic logic, pneumatic logic, optics, molecules, acoustics,^{[3]} or even mechanical or thermal^{[4]} elements.
Logic gates can be cascaded in the same way that Boolean functions can be composed, allowing the construction of a physical model of all of Boolean logic, and therefore, all of the algorithms and mathematics that can be described with Boolean logic. Logic circuits include such devices as multiplexers, registers, arithmetic logic units (ALUs), and computer memory, all the way up through complete microprocessors,^{[5]} which may contain more than 100 million logic gates.
Compound logic gates ANDORInvert (AOI) and ORANDInvert (OAI) are often employed in circuit design because their construction using MOSFETs is simpler and more efficient than the sum of the individual gates.^{[6]}
History and development[edit]
The binary number system was refined by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (published in 1705), influenced by the ancient I Ching's binary system.^{[7]}^{[8]} Leibniz established that using the binary system combined the principles of arithmetic and logic.
In an 1886 letter, Charles Sanders Peirce described how logical operations could be carried out by electrical switching circuits.^{[9]} Early electromechanical computers were constructed from switches and relay logic rather than the later innovations of vacuum tubes (thermionic valves) or transistors (from which later electronic computers were constructed). Ludwig Wittgenstein introduced a version of the 16row truth table as proposition 5.101 of Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus (1921). Walther Bothe, inventor of the coincidence circuit, got part of the 1954 Nobel Prize in physics, for the first modern electronic AND gate in 1924. Konrad Zuse designed and built electromechanical logic gates for his computer Z1 (from 1935 to 1938).
From 1934 to 1936, NEC engineer Akira Nakashima, Claude Shannon and Victor Shestakov introduced switching circuit theory in a series of papers showing that twovalued Boolean algebra, which they discovered independently, can describe the operation of switching circuits.^{[10]}^{[11]}^{[12]}^{[13]} Using this property of electrical switches to implement logic is the fundamental concept that underlies all electronic digital computers. Switching circuit theory became the foundation of digital circuit design, as it became widely known in the electrical engineering community during and after World War II, with theoretical rigor superseding the ad hoc methods that had prevailed previously.^{[13]}
Metal–oxide–semiconductor (MOS) devices in the forms of PMOS and NMOS were demonstrated by Bell Labs engineers Mohamed M. Atalla and Dawon Kahng in 1960.^{[14]} Both types were later combined and adapted into complementary MOS (CMOS) logic by ChihTang Sah and Frank Wanlass at Fairchild Semiconductor in 1963.^{[15]}
Symbols[edit]
There are two sets of symbols for elementary logic gates in common use, both defined in ANSI/IEEE Std 911984 and its supplement ANSI/IEEE Std 91a1991. The "distinctive shape" set, based on traditional schematics, is used for simple drawings and derives from United States Military Standard MILSTD806 of the 1950s and 1960s.^{[16]} It is sometimes unofficially described as "military", reflecting its origin. The "rectangular shape" set, based on ANSI Y32.14 and other early industry standards as later refined by IEEE and IEC, has rectangular outlines for all types of gate and allows representation of a much wider range of devices than is possible with the traditional symbols.^{[17]} The IEC standard, IEC 6061712, has been adopted by other standards, such as EN 6061712:1999 in Europe, BS EN 6061712:1999 in the United Kingdom, and DIN EN 6061712:1998 in Germany.
The mutual goal of IEEE Std 911984 and IEC 61712 was to provide a uniform method of describing the complex logic functions of digital circuits with schematic symbols. These functions were more complex than simple AND and OR gates. They could be mediumscale circuits such as a 4bit counter to a largescale circuit such as a microprocessor.
IEC 61712 and its renumbered successor IEC 6061712 do not explicitly show the "distinctive shape" symbols, but do not prohibit them.^{[17]} These are, however, shown in ANSI/IEEE Std 91 (and 91a) with this note: "The distinctiveshape symbol is, according to IEC Publication 617, Part 12, not preferred, but is not considered to be in contradiction to that standard." IEC 6061712 correspondingly contains the note (Section 2.1) "Although nonpreferred, the use of other symbols recognized by official national standards, that is distinctive shapes in place of symbols [list of basic gates], shall not be considered to be in contradiction with this standard. Usage of these other symbols in combination to form complex symbols (for example, use as embedded symbols) is discouraged." This compromise was reached between the respective IEEE and IEC working groups to permit the IEEE and IEC standards to be in mutual compliance with one another.
In the 1980s, schematics were the predominant method to design both circuit boards and custom ICs known as gate arrays. Today custom ICs and the fieldprogrammable gate array are typically designed with Hardware Description Languages (HDL) such as Verilog or VHDL.
Type  Distinctive shape (IEEE Std 91/91a1991) 
Rectangular shape (IEEE Std 91/91a1991) (IEC 6061712:1997) 
Boolean algebra between A and B  Truth table  

Singleinput gates  
Buffer 
 
NOT (inverter) 
or 
 
In electronics a NOT gate is more commonly called an inverter. The circle on the symbol is called a bubble and is used in logic diagrams to indicate a logic negation between the external logic state and the internal logic state (1 to 0 or vice versa). On a circuit diagram it must be accompanied by a statement asserting that the positive logic convention or negative logic convention is being used (high voltage level = 1 or low voltage level = 1, respectively). The wedge is used in circuit diagrams to directly indicate an activelow (low voltage level = 1) input or output without requiring a uniform convention throughout the circuit diagram. This is called Direct Polarity Indication. See IEEE Std 91/91A and IEC 6061712. Both the bubble and the wedge can be used on distinctiveshape and rectangularshape symbols on circuit diagrams, depending on the logic convention used. On pure logic diagrams, only the bubble is meaningful.  
Conjunction and disjunction  
AND  or 
 
OR  or 
 
Alternative denial and joint denial  
NAND  or 
 
NOR  or 
 
Exclusive or and biconditional  
XOR  or 
 
The output of a two input exclusiveOR is true only when the two input values are different, and false if they are equal, regardless of the value. If there are more than two inputs, the output of the distinctiveshape symbol is undefined. The output of the rectangularshaped symbol is true if the number of true inputs is exactly one or exactly the number following the "=" in the qualifying symbol.  
XNOR  or 

De Morgan equivalent symbols[edit]
By use of De Morgan's laws, an AND function is identical to an OR function with negated inputs and outputs. Likewise, an OR function is identical to an AND function with negated inputs and outputs. A NAND gate is equivalent to an OR gate with negated inputs, and a NOR gate is equivalent to an AND gate with negated inputs.
This leads to an alternative set of symbols for basic gates that use the opposite core symbol (AND or OR) but with the inputs and outputs negated. Use of these alternative symbols can make logic circuit diagrams much clearer and help to show accidental connection of an active high output to an active low input or vice versa. Any connection that has logic negations at both ends can be replaced by a negationless connection and a suitable change of gate or vice versa. Any connection that has a negation at one end and no negation at the other can be made easier to interpret by instead using the De Morgan equivalent symbol at either of the two ends. When negation or polarity indicators on both ends of a connection match, there is no logic negation in that path (effectively, bubbles "cancel"), making it easier to follow logic states from one symbol to the next. This is commonly seen in real logic diagrams – thus the reader must not get into the habit of associating the shapes exclusively as OR or AND shapes, but also take into account the bubbles at both inputs and outputs in order to determine the "true" logic function indicated.
A De Morgan symbol can show more clearly a gate's primary logical purpose and the polarity of its nodes that are considered in the "signaled" (active, on) state. Consider the simplified case where a twoinput NAND gate is used to drive a motor when either of its inputs are brought low by a switch. The "signaled" state (motor on) occurs when either one OR the other switch is on. Unlike a regular NAND symbol, which suggests AND logic, the De Morgan version, a two negativeinput OR gate, correctly shows that OR is of interest. The regular NAND symbol has a bubble at the output and none at the inputs (the opposite of the states that will turn the motor on), but the De Morgan symbol shows both inputs and output in the polarity that will drive the motor.
De Morgan's theorem is most commonly used to implement logic gates as combinations of only NAND gates, or as combinations of only NOR gates, for economic reasons.
Truth tables[edit]
Output comparison of various logic gates:
Input  Output  
A  Buffer  Inverter 
0  0  1 
1  1  0 
Input  Output  
A  B  AND  NAND  OR  NOR  XOR  XNOR 
0  0  0  1  0  1  0  1 
0  1  0  1  1  0  1  0 
1  0  0  1  1  0  1  0 
1  1  1  0  1  0  0  1 
Universal logic gates[edit]
Charles Sanders Peirce (during 1880–1881) showed that NOR gates alone (or alternatively NAND gates alone) can be used to reproduce the functions of all the other logic gates, but his work on it was unpublished until 1933.^{[18]} The first published proof was by Henry M. Sheffer in 1913, so the NAND logical operation is sometimes called Sheffer stroke; the logical NOR is sometimes called Peirce's arrow.^{[19]} Consequently, these gates are sometimes called universal logic gates.^{[20]}
type  NAND construction  NOR construction 

NOT  
AND  
NAND  
OR  
NOR  
XOR  
XNOR 
Data storage and sequential logic[edit]
Logic gates can also be used to hold a state, allowing data storage. A storage element can be constructed by connecting several gates in a "latch" circuit. Latching circuitry is used in static randomaccess memory. More complicated designs that use clock signals and that change only on a rising or falling edge of the clock are called edgetriggered "flipflops". Formally, a flipflop is called a bistable circuit, because it has two stable states which it can maintain indefinitely. The combination of multiple flipflops in parallel, to store a multiplebit value, is known as a register. When using any of these gate setups the overall system has memory; it is then called a sequential logic system since its output can be influenced by its previous state(s), i.e. by the sequence of input states. In contrast, the output from combinational logic is purely a combination of its present inputs, unaffected by the previous input and output states.
These logic circuits are used in computer memory. They vary in performance, based on factors of speed, complexity, and reliability of storage, and many different types of designs are used based on the application.
Manufacturing[edit]
Electronic gates[edit]
A functionally complete logic system may be composed of relays, valves (vacuum tubes), or transistors.
Electronic logic gates differ significantly from their relayandswitch equivalents. They are much faster, consume much less power, and are much smaller (all by a factor of a million or more in most cases). Also, there is a fundamental structural difference. The switch circuit creates a continuous metallic path for current to flow (in either direction) between its input and its output. The semiconductor logic gate, on the other hand, acts as a highgain voltage amplifier, which sinks a tiny current at its input and produces a lowimpedance voltage at its output. It is not possible for current to flow between the output and the input of a semiconductor logic gate.
For smallscale logic, designers now use prefabricated logic gates from families of devices such as the TTL 7400 series by Texas Instruments, the CMOS 4000 series by RCA, and their more recent descendants. Increasingly, these fixedfunction logic gates are being replaced by programmable logic devices, which allow designers to pack many mixed logic gates into a single integrated circuit. The fieldprogrammable nature of programmable logic devices such as FPGAs has reduced the 'hard' property of hardware; it is now possible to change the logic design of a hardware system by reprogramming some of its components, thus allowing the features or function of a hardware implementation of a logic system to be changed.
An important advantage of standardized integrated circuit logic families, such as the 7400 and 4000 families, is that they can be cascaded. This means that the output of one gate can be wired to the inputs of one or several other gates, and so on. Systems with varying degrees of complexity can be built without great concern of the designer for the internal workings of the gates, provided the limitations of each integrated circuit are considered.
The output of one gate can only drive a finite number of inputs to other gates, a number called the 'fanout limit'. Also, there is always a delay, called the 'propagation delay', from a change in input of a gate to the corresponding change in its output. When gates are cascaded, the total propagation delay is approximately the sum of the individual delays, an effect which can become a problem in highspeed synchronous circuits. Additional delay can be caused when many inputs are connected to an output, due to the distributed capacitance of all the inputs and wiring and the finite amount of current that each output can provide.
Logic families[edit]
There are several logic families with different characteristics (power consumption, speed, cost, size) such as: RDL (resistor–diode logic), RTL (resistortransistor logic), DTL (diode–transistor logic), TTL (transistor–transistor logic) and CMOS. There are also subvariants, e.g. standard CMOS logic vs. advanced types using still CMOS technology, but with some optimizations for avoiding loss of speed due to slower PMOS transistors.
The simplest family of logic gates uses bipolar transistors, and is called resistor–transistor logic (RTL). Unlike simple diode logic gates (which do not have a gain element), RTL gates can be cascaded indefinitely to produce more complex logic functions. RTL gates were used in early integrated circuits. For higher speed and better density, the resistors used in RTL were replaced by diodes resulting in diode–transistor logic (DTL). Transistor–transistor logic (TTL) then supplanted DTL.
As integrated circuits became more complex, bipolar transistors were replaced with smaller fieldeffect transistors (MOSFETs); see PMOS and NMOS. To reduce power consumption still further, most contemporary chip implementations of digital systems now use CMOS logic. CMOS uses complementary (both nchannel and pchannel) MOSFET devices to achieve a high speed with low power dissipation.
Other types of logic gates include, but are not limited to:^{[21]}
Logic family  Abbreviation  Description 

Diode logic  DL  
Tunnel diode logic  TDL  Exactly the same as diode logic but can perform at a higher speed.^{[failed verification]} 
Neon logic  NL  Uses neon bulbs or 3element neon trigger tubes to perform logic. 
Core diode logic  CDL  Performed by semiconductor diodes and small ferrite toroidal cores for moderate speed and moderate power level. 
4Layer Device Logic  4LDL  Uses thyristors and SCRs to perform logic operations where high current and or high voltages are required. 
Directcoupled transistor logic  DCTL  Uses transistors switching between saturated and cutoff states to perform logic. The transistors require carefully controlled parameters. Economical because few other components are needed, but tends to be susceptible to noise because of the lower voltage levels employed. Often considered to be the father to modern TTL logic. 
Metal–oxide–semiconductor logic  MOS  Uses MOSFETs (metal–oxide–semiconductor fieldeffect transistors), the basis for most modern logic gates. The MOS logic family includes PMOS logic, NMOS logic, complementary MOS (CMOS), and BiCMOS (bipolar CMOS). 
Currentmode logic  CML  Uses transistors to perform logic but biasing is from constant current sources to prevent saturation and allow extremely fast switching. Has high noise immunity despite fairly low logic levels. 
Quantumdot cellular automata  QCA  Uses tunnelable qbits for synthesizing the binary logic bits. The electrostatic repulsive force in between two electrons in the quantum dots assigns the electron configurations (that defines state 1 or state 0) under the suitably driven polarizations. This is a transistorless, currentless, junctionless binary logic synthesis technique allowing it to have very fast operation speeds. 
Ferroelectric FET  FeFET  FeFET transistors can retain their state to speed recovery in case of a power loss.^{[22]} 
Threestate logic gates[edit]
A threestate logic gate is a type of logic gate that can have three different outputs: high (H), low (L) and highimpedance (Z). The highimpedance state plays no role in the logic, which is strictly binary. These devices are used on buses of the CPU to allow multiple chips to send data. A group of threestates driving a line with a suitable control circuit is basically equivalent to a multiplexer, which may be physically distributed over separate devices or plugin cards.
In electronics, a high output would mean the output is sourcing current from the positive power terminal (positive voltage). A low output would mean the output is sinking current to the negative power terminal (zero voltage). High impedance would mean that the output is effectively disconnected from the circuit.
Nonelectronic logic gates[edit]
Nonelectronic implementations are varied, though few of them are used in practical applications. Many early electromechanical digital computers, such as the Harvard Mark I, were built from relay logic gates, using electromechanical relays. Logic gates can be made using pneumatic devices, such as the Sorteberg relay or mechanical logic gates, including on a molecular scale.^{[23]} Various types of fundamental logic gates have been constructed using molecules (molecular logic gates), which are based on chemical inputs and spectroscopic outputs.^{[24]} Logic gates have been made out of DNA (see DNA nanotechnology)^{[25]} and used to create a computer called MAYA (see MAYAII). Logic gates can be made from quantum mechanical effects, see quantum logic gate. Photonic logic gates use nonlinear optical effects.
In principle any method that leads to a gate that is functionally complete (for example, either a NOR or a NAND gate) can be used to make any kind of digital logic circuit. Note that the use of 3state logic for bus systems is not needed, and can be replaced by digital multiplexers, which can be built using only simple logic gates (such as NAND gates, NOR gates, or AND and OR gates).
See also[edit]
 Andinverter graph
 Boolean algebra topics
 Boolean function
 Depletionload NMOS logic
 Digital circuit
 Espresso heuristic logic minimizer
 Emittercoupled logic
 Fanout
 Fieldprogrammable gate array (FPGA)
 Flipflop (electronics)
 Functional completeness
 Integrated injection logic
 Karnaugh map
 Combinational logic
 List of 4000 series integrated circuits
 List of 7400 series integrated circuits
 Logic family
 Logic level
 Logical graph
 Magnetic logic
 NMOS logic
 Parametron
 Processor design
 Programmable logic controller (PLC)
 Programmable logic device (PLD)
 Propositional calculus
 Race hazard
 Reversible computing
 Superconducting computing
 Truth table
 Unconventional computing
References[edit]
 ^ Jaeger (1997). Microelectronic Circuit Design. McGrawHill. pp. 226–233. ISBN 0070324824.
 ^ Kanellos, Michael (20030211). "Moore's Law to roll on for another decade". CNET. From Integrated circuit
 ^ https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/articleabstract/106/11/113503/27163/AcousticlogicgatesandBooleanoperationbased?redirectedFrom=fulltext
 ^ Wang, Lei; Li, Baowen (2007). "Thermal Logic Gates: Computation with Phonons". Physical Review Letters. 99 (17): 177208. arXiv:0709.0032. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..99q7208W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.177208. PMID 17995368. S2CID 10934270.
 ^ Deschamps, JeanPierre; Valderrama, Elena; Terés, Lluís (20161012). Digital Systems: From Logic Gates to Processors. Springer. ISBN 9783319411989.
 ^ Tinder, Richard F. (2000). Engineering digital design (2nd ed.). Academic Press. pp. 317–319. ISBN 0126912955.
 ^ Nylan, Michael (2001). The Five "Confucian" Classics. Yale University Press. pp. 204–206. ISBN 9780300081855. Retrieved 20100608.
 ^ Perkins, Franklin (2004). "Exchange with China". Leibniz and China: A Commerce of Light. Cambridge University Press. p. 117. ISBN 9780521830249.
... one of the traditional orderings of the hexagrams, the xiantian tu ordering made by Shao Yong, was, with a few modifications, the same order found in Leibniz's binary arithmetic.
 ^ Peirce, C. S., "Letter, Peirce to A. Marquand", dated 1886, Writings of Charles S. Peirce, v. 5, 1993, pp. 420–423. See Burks, Arthur W. (1978). "Review: Charles S. Peirce, The new elements of mathematics". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 84 (5): 913–918 [917]. doi:10.1090/S000299041978145339.
 ^ Yamada, Akihiko (2004). "History of Research on Switching Theory in Japan". IEEJ Transactions on Fundamentals and Materials. 124 (8). Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan: 720–726. Bibcode:2004IJTFM.124..720Y. doi:10.1541/ieejfms.124.720.
 ^ "Switching Theory/Relay Circuit Network Theory/Theory of Logical Mathematics". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan.
 ^ Stanković, Radomir S.; Astola, Jaakko T.; Karpovsky, Mark G. (2007). Some Historical Remarks on Switching Theory. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.66.1248.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Stanković, Radomir S. [in German]; Astola, Jaakko Tapio [in Finnish], eds. (2008). Reprints from the Early Days of Information Sciences: TICSP Series On the Contributions of Akira Nakashima to Switching Theory (PDF). Tampere International Center for Signal Processing (TICSP) Series. Vol. 40. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland. ISBN 9789521519802. ISSN 14562774. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20210308.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) (3+207+1 pages) 10:00 min  ^ Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer. pp. 321–323. ISBN 9783540342588.
 ^ "1963: Complementary MOS Circuit Configuration is Invented". Computer History Museum. Retrieved 20190706.
 ^ "Graphical Symbols for Logic Diagrams". ASSIST Quick Search. Defense Logistics Agency. MILSTD806. Retrieved 20210827.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} "Overview of IEEE Standard 911984 Explanation of Logic Symbols" (PDF). Texas Instruments Semiconductor Group. 1996. SDYZ001A.
 ^ Peirce, C. S. (manuscript winter of 1880–1881), "A Boolian Algebra with One Constant", published 1933 in Collected Papers v. 4, paragraphs 12–20. Reprinted 1989 in Writings of Charles S. Peirce v. 4, pp. 218–221, Google [1]. See Roberts, Don D. (2009). "7.12 The Graphical Analysis of Propositions". The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce. De Gruyter. p. 131. ISBN 9783110226225.
 ^ Büning, Hans Kleine; Lettmann, Theodor (1999). Propositional logic: deduction and algorithms. Cambridge University Press. p. 2. ISBN 9780521630177.
 ^ Bird, John (2007). Engineering mathematics. Newnes. p. 532. ISBN 9780750685559.
 ^ Rowe, Jim. "Circuit Logic – Why and How". No. December 1966. Electronics Australia.
 ^ "Tapping into NonVolatile Logic". 20210421.
 ^ Merkle, Ralph C. (1993). "Two Types of Mechanical Reversible Logic". Xerox PARC.
 ^ ErbasCakmak, Sundus; Kolemen, Safacan; Sedgwick, Adam C.; Gunnlaugsson, Thorfinnur; James, Tony D.; Yoon, Juyoung; Akkaya, Engin U. (2018). "Molecular logic gates: the past, present and future". Chemical Society Reviews. 47 (7): 2228–2248. doi:10.1039/C7CS00491E. hdl:11693/50034. ISSN 03060012. PMID 29493684.
 ^ Stojanovic, Milan N.; Mitchell, Tiffany E.; Stefanovic, Darko (2002). "DeoxyribozymeBased Logic Gates". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 124 (14): 3555–3561. doi:10.1021/ja016756v. PMID 11929243.
Further reading[edit]
 Awschalom, D. D.; Loss, D.; Samarth, N. (2002). Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation. Springer. ISBN 9783540421764.
 Bostock, Geoff (1988). Programmable logic devices: technology and applications. McGrawHill. ISBN 9780070066113.
 Brown, Stephen D.; Francis, Robert J.; Rose, Jonathan; Vranesic, Zvonko G. (1992). Field Programmable Gate Arrays. Kluwer Academic. ISBN 9780792392484.
External links[edit]
 Media related to Logic gates at Wikimedia Commons